Financial crises rarely start on the day an organization cannot make payroll.
Usually, the warning signs were there much earlier.
I’ve walked into health centers where leadership knew finances were getting tighter, but no single issue seemed serious enough to call a crisis. Revenue was a little below budget. Accounts receivable was higher than leadership wanted. Cash was tighter than it used to be. A few vendor payments were being held.
There was an explanation for every one of those things.
The problem was not necessarily any single explanation.
The problem was the pattern.
That is one of the things I have learned to look for when evaluating the financial condition of a health center. Financial trouble often develops gradually enough that leadership becomes accustomed to each new problem.
Recognizing the pattern early gives leadership something incredibly valuable: time.
Cash Is Getting Tighter — Even When There Is Still Money in the Bank
One of the first things I want to understand is cash.
But knowing today’s bank balance doesn’t tell me enough.
I’ve worked with organizations where leadership could tell me how much cash was in the bank but had a much harder time answering the next questions.
How much of that cash is truly available?
What needs to be paid over the next several weeks?
What does the next payroll require?
Are we delaying anything because we are waiting for cash to come in?
Is normal operations generating enough cash to sustain the organization?
That tells me much more than the bank balance alone.
A health center can still have money in the bank and be experiencing significant cash pressure.
The warning sign is often not that cash is gone.
It is that managing cash has started requiring more and more attention.
Revenue Is Being Reported, but It Isn’t Turning Into Cash
I have seen financial reports that show revenue, expenses, and net income and still leave leadership without a clear picture of the organization’s financial condition.
That is because an income statement only tells part of the story.
If revenue looks relatively stable but cash keeps declining, I want to know what is happening between earning the revenue and collecting it.
Accounts receivable is one place to look.
Are claims being submitted timely?
Are denials increasing?
Are credentialing issues holding up claims?
Are older receivables accumulating?
Has payer mix changed?
Are staff effectively working outstanding accounts?
Are operational issues affecting documentation, coding, or billing?
Revenue on a financial statement does not make payroll.
Cash does.
That is why I become concerned when accounts receivable continues growing while available cash continues declining.
Neither number should be viewed by itself.
The Same Problems Keep Getting Explained Month After Month
Every organization has unfavorable months.
A provider leaves. Visits fall below budget. A payment is delayed. An unexpected expense occurs. Credentialing takes longer than anticipated.
Those explanations may be completely legitimate.
What gets my attention is when I hear versions of the same explanation month after month while the financial trend continues moving in the wrong direction.
At some point, explaining the variance is no longer enough.
If patient revenue has missed budget for several months, leadership needs to understand whether the original assumptions are still realistic.
Has visit volume changed?
Has payer mix shifted?
Is provider productivity lower than anticipated?
Are collections lagging?
Have reimbursement assumptions changed?
Or was the original budget simply too optimistic?
The question needs to move from:
Why did we miss budget this month?
to:
What do we now believe is going to happen for the rest of the year?
That is an important financial leadership distinction.
The original budget tells you what you thought would happen.
A good forecast tells you what you now believe will happen.
The Organization Starts Managing Around Cash
This is where financial pressure can become much easier to see.
I’ve seen organizations reach the point where paying bills is no longer a routine process.
Someone is deciding which vendors need to be paid now and which ones can wait.
A payment that normally would have gone out this week gets held until next week.
Then another one gets held.
Leadership may begin negotiating payment plans, using a line of credit, delaying expenditures, relying on one-time funds, or finding another temporary source of cash.
Sometimes those are appropriate short-term strategies. They can give an organization valuable time to address a problem.
But there is an important distinction between using a temporary solution and depending on temporary solutions to sustain normal operations.
The same is true with payroll.
If leadership is routinely watching deposits to determine whether payroll will clear or arranging other payments around payroll dates, the question should not simply be whether the organization can make the next payroll.
Leadership needs to understand what happens with the payroll after that.
Temporary cash can buy time.
It cannot permanently solve an operating model that consumes more cash than it generates.
Leadership Is Looking at Individual Numbers Instead of the Financial Story
This may be the biggest warning sign of all.
I don’t look at one unfavorable indicator and conclude that an organization is in financial trouble.
Context matters.
Cash may decline temporarily for a perfectly reasonable reason. Accounts receivable may increase because of timing. A budget variance may be unusual rather than structural.
But when several things begin happening together, I pay attention.
Cash is declining.
Accounts receivable is increasing.
Revenue repeatedly misses budget.
Vendor payments are slowing.
Temporary cash solutions are becoming routine.
And leadership is still discussing each one as though it is a separate issue.
That is when the pattern becomes more important than any individual number.
This is also why I believe financial reporting to CEOs and boards has to go beyond revenue, expenses, and net income.
Those numbers matter.
But leadership also needs enough information to understand liquidity, the balance sheet, revenue cycle performance, budget trends, and what is likely to happen next.
A board cannot govern financial risk it cannot see.
And a CEO cannot respond to a deteriorating financial position if the reporting continues to make the organization look healthier than it actually is.
The Earlier You See It, the More Choices You Have
One of the hardest things about financial recovery is that the available choices shrink as cash disappears.
Earlier in the process, leadership may have time to address revenue cycle problems, improve provider productivity, reconsider staffing or expenses, reforecast operations, renegotiate obligations, strengthen controls, change service strategies, or build a structured cash plan.
Later, the choices become much less comfortable.
That is why I don’t think the most important question is:
Are we in a financial crisis yet?
A much better question is:
What is our financial information trying to tell us right now?
Strong financial leadership means recognizing when the organization’s financial story is changing — and being willing to act before the situation becomes an emergency.
The numbers usually tell you something before the crisis does.
You just have to be looking at enough of them to hear what they are saying.
Concerned About Your Health Center’s Financial Direction?
Cris Julian Consulting provides Financial Recovery & Turnaround support for Community Health Centers experiencing financial pressure, cash-flow challenges, deteriorating operating performance, or the need for stronger financial leadership.
The work begins by understanding what is actually driving the organization’s financial condition — not simply treating the most visible symptom — and helping leadership establish clear priorities and a practical path forward.
Learn more about Financial Recovery & Turnaround at crisjulian.com.
Leave a comment